MST. NAFEES AKHTAR IJAZ versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Article 12 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 The suit for the specific performance of the contract agreement only the seller of the suit and another defendant filed their independent written statement, while the other defendants did not appear for the defendant / vendor in this case. Because of The suit property that sued the plaintiff's claim, the suit was pronounced against all the defendants, except that who filed the written statement, two appeals were filed against the decision of the trial, the plaintiff against the plaintiff. Against the removal of the case. Who filed a written statement. And the Second Appellate Court of Appeal, in one of its verdicts, set aside the trial court's unclean judgment and order by the defendants against the preceding order presented below, and after providing the opportunity for a hearing. This case received further remand for its decision. All relevant defendants, who filed the written statement, moved the appeal against the decision of the appellate court when it was stated that all the other defendants were not present at the hearing of the appeal because of their absence. He appeared in court and made the statement and acknowledged the defendant's appeal. The appellate court's decision below was set to the extent of the defendant and the trial court approved by the trial court was reinstated, when its unconstitutional order showed that it had a preliminary period of litigation. The order passed by the High Court had already been reinstated. Accepting the first appellate order, further proceedings in this case were not guaranteed by law and the record was not ordered.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
