Section 2 (2 (b) / Q 34) sentenced the court for the appreciation of the evidence, the possibility of consideration and consultation in the immediately-filed FIR, excluding the names of the accused, Seats, guilt weapons, and names of witnesses. The allegation made by the complainant in the FIR was against the accused. The accused identified in the light of the electric bulb did not have a negative effect on the prosecution's case during the investigation by the police. They are not unfamiliar with the accused, their close relationship with the deceased had no valid basis for dismissing their testimony. The presence of four eyewitnesses was well described at the time of the incident. I found the stained sieve and the knife / stab Ian was found in human blood, it further confirmed the defense request that the suspect's murder was charged with serious and sudden aggravated assault, It was impossible and incredible and contradicted human nature. , The defendant failed to prove his specific request under Article 121 of the Martyrdom Act, 1984 according to which the conviction of the two accused was upheld, however, according to medical evidence, there was no difference in the role of the two accused. The victim, therefore, was sentenced to death, sentenced to life imprisonment while the other defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment and accordingly the appeal was disposed of. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
