Section 2 302 (b) The conviction of Qatil-Umid evidence, lack of correlation of eyewitness testimony with the deceased was not enough to disprove their testimony The incident occurred near the residence of the prosecution witnesses and the eyes of the accused. The presence of witnesses at the scene of the incident was natural, which clearly explained their attractiveness on the occasion. The ocular witnesses were fully supported by the medical evidence, the defendant's case was substantially related to the case of the accompanying accomplice, who was acquitted on trial for legal reasons. The omnibus had no universal plea in Uni Falls and the grain had to be spilled to ensure justice and the motive for the defendant's incident against the accused was wrong and his confession thereafter could not be proved guilty. Therefore, the intact gun recovery was inconsistent, the accused fired a single shot-fired high D prevented the only way to the accused's home, which prompted the suspect to commit the incident, the suspect being detained He was entitled to take advantage of the circumstances, the death sentence of the accused was sentenced to life imprisonment.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
