Section 7 (2) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Court for the Reinstatement of witnesses The Principals petitioned for the preparation of the testimony of the applicants after the conclusion of the evidence of both parties was dismissed by the Family Court on the ground that such The list of witnesses was not submitted by the applicant with the written statement of the applicants for section 7 (2) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964. It has been considered that the parties, by the permission of the court, Can also call a witness on stage. If the court considered such evidence in the interest of the Family Court in an unconstitutional order, there was no observation that the evidence of such witnesses was sufficient for the benefit of justice; the fact that the list was written Witnesses were not presented with the statement, no restriction was made for the presentation of any witness at any intervals. The Family Court may, in exercise of its discretion, make such orders as may be necessary to abolish justice. Did not have to follow this rule unless explicitly provided but contrary to this, every action was prohibited. Should be declared. The principle is that every procedure should be considered valid unless prohibited by law; as a general rule, prohibition cannot be considered; the family court's order directing the application for preparation of the applicants. The template was set. Witnesses are considered to have been accepted accordingly, a constitutional application was allowed \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
