Section 2 302 (at) convictions of conviction of evidence, reduction of mitigation conditions FIR was filed very swiftly The ocular witness was constant on every material point and the location and location of the incident, procedure. And confidence was impacted by that. The incidents of the incident, the location of the wounds inflicted by the accused and the weapon used by the accused during the incident, were previously known to witnesses, misidentification of the perpetrators or the accused. There was no question of replacing eyewitnesses at the relevant time, the witness's relationship with the complainant or the victim was normal, and their unethical behavior with the accused was the only evidence contained by such witnesses. Such evidence can be convincing without co-operation. , If its intrinsic value affects the trust of the court and the result is witnesses saw that the accused could not take advantage of his weakness as the trigger of the gun with the right hand left finger Can be pressed. Medical evidence substantiated the ocular testimony and recovery of the crime weapon was not acceptable, yet the account and medical evidence substantiated the accused's guilt, therefore, established by the prosecution. The trigger was not believed to have resulted in the recovery of the weapons of the offense. Was brought on record by either party, who took the statement under section 2342 by the accused, the CCP was not denied, saying that the appeal in view of the mitigating situation was
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
