MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus JUDGE, ANTI-TERRORISIM COURT
Section 17, 23 and 7 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 365 A / 302 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution of Appeal for ransom, murder and AMD anti-terrorism court The decision was sent to the decision. Legally, the Anti-Terrorism Court, while prosecuting the crime, established the opinion that after the formation of various opinions under Section 23 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, the matter of Scheduled Crime under Section 65A65A, PPC Was not removed. The jurisdiction to pass a final decision at the trial and the sole authority was to pass the case to the court of general jurisdiction, as defined in section 23 of the Act, scope of section 23 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997. Was provided by. The specific points of the trial, rather than the use of word cognition that includes the trial, were aware of the fact that in some cases the question of jurisdiction could be justified by the recording of some evidence. Later decided that the umpian order
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
