A. XXXVII, Rr 1, 2, 3 and suit for recovery of money, subject to leave conditional, appeal to persons subject to supply as guarantor guarantee equal to defendant's satisfaction of the strike of defense and It is allowed to defend. The trial court's defendants presented a guaranteed bond equal to a portion of the total amount claimed in the claim, and the trial court directed them to meet the reduction in the guaranteed bond bond and to further provide the guarantee subject to the grant of a guaranteed bond. Has not been received and has been finalized. Under the obligation to fulfill the condition under which they were discharged to defend the case and the case, the defendants also sought more time to do the work necessary for the satisfaction of the trial court and the trial. Despite the defendants' extension in the case, the matter remained pending for that purpose. The pre-requisite and pre-order granted under the trial court's grant of bail were not sufficient to be inadequate. The initial review petition did not interfere with the satisfaction of the trial court by the High Court. On which he was discharged to appear before the court and there was no unlawful interference with the jurisdiction to confirm his defense. The order passed by the trial court review was dismissed in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
