Sections 497 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 392 and 411 of the robbery, fraudulently stolen property, when the complainant was armed with a weapon, the defendant's assertion was that he was not named in the FIR And it was included in the commission of the crime by the complainant's subpoena, recorded six days after the incident. That the FIR was filed with a delay of one day. That no identification parade was held to link the accused to the commission of the crime, and that no private person was selected at the time of the recovery raid, which violated section 103, c. Although the accuracy of the CP was registered against the FIR, unknown details were given but the material details and graphic details of the accused were filed on the very next day of the incident, so it cannot be said that The delay was in which a motorcycle belonging to the complainant was recovered. The accused would not have the benefit of Section 103, CR PC, as it had led to the recovery of the motorcycle itself, which was taken away from the complainant, the accused was charged with Section 392, CR PC. Came under the ban. Section 497 clause, under the circumstances, the accused's PC bail application dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
