Article 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Suit for dissolution of marriage, restitution allowance and division of property, Plaintiff (wife) in her case of dissolution of marriage and care in the jurisdiction of the Family Court. Was claimed. The husband) agreed to move 1 / 3rd of a plot in his name at the time of the marriage, but he failed to comply with the claim of the plaintiff's claim for the marriage contract and the entry in column number 17 of the marriage contract. Was. The family court ruled in the case after the disruption and disruption, and the appellate court upheld the family court's findings, suggesting that the family court has the authority to entertain the case in connection with the claim to participate in the plot. Because it is the personal property of the defendant in the plaintiff. It disclosed that the claimant had promised to pay 1 / 3rd of the plot to the plaintiff, saying the promise remained unfulfilled as the claimant had not yet acquired the ownership of the share in the claimant's claim. I was not personally affiliated with the plaintiff to draw section 5 and schedule of the West Pakistan Family Court Act, 1964 for the determination of this right, not the family court, but the courts enjoyed the full scope. The subsequent courts were misinterpreted in the law contained in section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, which stated that the plaintiff's claim was Fame. Applicable to the Lee Court decision and the order entered by the courts. The following were declared illegal, with no legal authority and no legal proceedings and claims for 1/3 part of the plaintiff's case.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
