AMER BAKHT AZAM versus COOPERATIVE MODEL TOWN SOCIETY (1962) LTD.
Section 3 Cooperative Society Act (VII of 1925), Section 454 Punjab Private Site Development Schemes (Regulations) Rules, 2005, Rr 1 (d) and 14 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Intra-Court Appeal Maintenance for Master Garden of Open Space Fruit Garden I am specific. The Housing Society challenged this agreement by rejecting a constitutional application for the acquisition of residential properties on such land by a single bench of the High Court on the basis of the availability of alternatives under the relevant rules and regulations. , The written request did not challenge any order passed by the Development Authority. The treatment of arbitration under section 454 of the Cooperative Society Act, 1925, as defined in R1 (d) of the Punjab Private Site Development Schemes (Regulations) Rules, 2005, cannot be termed a solution under appeal, review or review definition. As provided under Section 3 (2) of the Law Reform Ordinance 1972, the treatment of a writ petitioner against the applicant seeking a decision on the availability of alternatives shall not be binding on the Division Bench of the High Court while Intra-Court of Appeal filed against improper judgment while examining the accuracy of the case was worth hearing.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
