Section 18, 14 and 17 of the West Pakistan Civilian Rent Ordinance (VI of 1959), a dismissal request for enforcement of the award under section 13 constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 constitutional application and rent controller in civil court Strengthen simultaneous proceedings in front of 17 Scope ejection petition of the Arbitration Act, 1940, which was in the final stages of the judgment before the controller of rent, and the matter was referred to the panel's arbitrators. The award, which was presented to the civil court for enforcement, requested the petitioner to unite in the proceedings on the basis that the presiding officer who applied for the award of the presidency of the House was also accidentally In this case the applicant's application as a rent controller was validated before the rental controller was in the process of termination while the arbitration act under the Civil Court Arbitration Act, 1940, was already in the initial stages. Under 1940, the petition for appeal was to be served by the civil court while the filing of the appeal was made. Reward was. By the Rent Controller, who was a personal nominee under the provisions of the West Pakistan Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959. Similarly, the two jurisdictions were completely separate, separation in both cases, matters, evidence and other material were different, should be decided independently and different jurisdiction could be assigned to a separate civil judge, e.g. However, as a rent control or family judge, this did not mean that all proceedings against the same civil judge, using different jurisdictions, were integrated.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
