Find a Lawyer

RAZA MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD KHAN

The Section Award30 Award, aside from the arbitral arbitration, neither the parties heard nor gave any reason in the award, nor did it mention which award would be given to each party at the end of which the disputed land. Some additions have been made that were intended to give reason for the arbitrator to be bound, adding new letters at the end of the award, which could result in some consideration and mention of any reason. Non-mediation did not meet the requirements of the law by the arbitrator, the award was set aside. Conditions

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• TARIQ MASIH alias BADSHAH v. State 2012 PCrLJ 482
• ARSHAD AHMAD alias M. ARSHAD v. MUHAMMAD YAR 2012 PLD 483
• FIDA HUSSAIN v. CHAIRMAN BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCTION, MULTAN 2012 PLC(CS) 483
• AWAIS SHEIKH v. SECRETARY MINISTRY OF INTERIOR, ISLAMABAD 2012 PLD 488
• MUHAMMAD KHALID v. MUHAMMAD NAEEM 2012 PLD 490
• SECRETARY WAFAQI MOHTASIB v. CAPITAL STEEL RE-ROLLING MILLS through Partner 2012 PLD 493
• Pir ALLY IMMRAWAN SAHAR ESSAPHEL v. JUDGE ANTI-TERRORISM COURT 2012 PCrLJ 498
• MUHAMMAD AHMED SHEIKH v. J.S. BANK LIMITED 2012 CLC 498

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

jobs for advocates from Kotla Pathan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes