SECRETARY WAFAQI MOHTASIB versus CAPITAL STEEL RE-ROLLING MILLS THROUGH PARTNER
Article 19 Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), the appeal of the Section 3 infra-related delegation was related to the passage of counsel's decree, especially when Article 19 of the Office of the Federal Ombudsman was vacant. Under the Delegated Delegation Ombudsman Order, 1983, the Federal Ombudsman had no independent right to take any action. The authorized / delegate may investigate and investigate the complaint, but has to submit its recommendations to the Federal Content for appropriate orders. Under the Office of Delegation Ombudsman Order, 1983, only the person who could pass the recommendations and advisers / authorized officer could investigate and investigate the matter and submit its report or recommendations to the federal content, As such, the delegation did not have free options. The reason for not assigning powers to the advisers / competent officers to issue any recommendation was, indirectly, as under the oath of office of the Federal Ombudsman, the Ombudsman (Ombudsman) Order, 1983, when the adviser appointed only the deputy content And was not under oath of the Ombudsman read with Article 19 of the establishment of the Federal Office. The Ombudsman Order, 1983 showed that the Federal Ombudsman does not have the authority to delegate its powers to approve a final recommendation, so if the Principal (Ombudsman) fails to assign its powers, their agent Cannot claim that they have options. Following the approval of the Ombudsman's decision by a single High Court judge, the inquiry was held to the extent of initiating an inquiry against the counselors who approved the recommendations in the absence of a fiduciary intra-court appeal. was r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
