Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD AHMAD ALIAS M. ARSHAD versus MUHAMMAD YAR

The trial for the declaration of ownership on the basis of the alleged gift proceedings established by the Appellate Court under section 42 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, which could have been approved for the declaration of pre-emptive right, but they could not produce. A new right is not required to file such a case, if the alleged gift was sufficient to transfer the right to the suit property in favor of the plaintiff and the alleged donor was still alive and even if the accused plaintiff sought to establish his rights in the suit property through the court A lawsuit was filed for Such a statement was not qualified by a declaration that the decree passed by the trial court was in contravention of the law and the appellate court had rejected the petition filed by the same High Court.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• MUSARRAT BIBI v. MUHAMMAD NAWAZ 2012 MLD 474
• M. AHMED SH. v. J.S.B. BANK LIMITED 2012 CLD 477
• ABDUL HAQ and Legal Heirs v. MUHAMMAD SAJJAD 2012 PLD 480
• TARIQ MASIH alias BADSHAH v. State 2012 PCrLJ 482
• FIDA HUSSAIN v. CHAIRMAN BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCTION, MULTAN 2012 PLC(CS) 483
• AWAIS SHEIKH v. SECRETARY MINISTRY OF INTERIOR, ISLAMABAD 2012 PLD 488
• RAZA MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD KHAN 2012 CLD 488
• MUHAMMAD KHALID v. MUHAMMAD NAEEM 2012 PLD 490

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

jobs for advocates from Sahiwal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes