Find a Lawyer

ABDUL ALEEM versus ISLAMIC WELFARE TRUST THROUGH HAFIZ HUSSAIN AZHAR

Section 24 Case Transfer Request Transfer submitted the pending case to the Additional Sessions Judge that the presiding officer had previously decided two criminal reviews on the same subject and parties. And now the same thing is happening on behalf of the civil party, it was the right of each party to play justice and the applicant cannot be deprived of this right, especially when he lost the trust of the presiding officer. There will be no reason to transfer the matter. On the other hand, in the circumstances, the application for transfer was accepted

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• MUHAMMAD KHALID v. MUHAMMAD NAEEM 2012 PLD 490
• SECRETARY WAFAQI MOHTASIB v. CAPITAL STEEL RE-ROLLING MILLS through Partner 2012 PLD 493
• Pir ALLY IMMRAWAN SAHAR ESSAPHEL v. JUDGE ANTI-TERRORISM COURT 2012 PCrLJ 498
• MUHAMMAD AHMED SHEIKH v. J.S. BANK LIMITED 2012 CLC 498
• TOYOTA GARDEN MOTORS (PVT.) LTD. v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Home Secretary, Punjab, Lahore 2012 PLD 503
• ISHRAT alias SHAISTA v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2012 MLD 507
• ZAFAR IQBAL v. State 2012 PCrLJ 507
• NIAZ AKHTAR v. THE STATE 2012 PLD 512

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

patent advocate from Shaheed Benazirabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes