PIR ALLY IMMRAWAN SAHAR ESSAPHEL versus JUDGE ANTI-TERRORISM COURT
Section 200 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 337 F / 506B Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (c) Constitutional Petition, Criminal Intimidation, Terrorism Proceedings of the Court Attack in the room. The trial of the private complaint complaint was dismissed primarily by the trial court for delay in filing the complaint; the respondent failed to reject the petitioner's position that there was no limitation in the criminal law for filing the complaint. Had gone and the applicant was pursuing the case permanently and in that regard he had also filed an FIR and, in frustration with the police officers, resorted to filing a private complaint, the petitioner testified. As a statement, I supported his complaint, which was substantiated by the statement of another witness. , The trial court was not justified in the trial. The dismissal of the complaint, the constitutional request was accepted and the trial court's order was set aside.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
