ASHER WASEEM BHATTI versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU
Sections 9, 10, 18 and 32 accused 16 bank witnesses in this case, citing fraud and misuse of check books by bank employee, accountability court prosecution to prove the matter. They were all engaged in a lengthy examination, but nothing could be found out of their mouths for the accused. The prosecution's witnesses were consistent with every aspect of the case and did not contradict each other on material matters. Has been cleared in clear terms that the foreign bank's exchange department, where the alleged embezzlement was headed, was headed by the accused and the controversial checks were approved, in which case he was responsible for the crime. The department was in charge of the Foreign Exchange, which was headed. The record shows that the accused had opened an account in the name of his brother-in-law, and withdrew the money by check, no cross question was asked by the accused to negate the prosecution's version. , The prosecution's testimony was fully stated and exposed by the fact that the defendant's handling of the indictment by defense lawyer Hendroti was not positive or that the expert's report was positive. It was reported that some foreign currency account holders submitted check books with the accused in charge of the Foreign Exchange, but they Instead of eliminating the check books, the accused used the same. Dispute Settlement Advocate for the accused could not be able to disclose any defects in the prosecution's evidence The trial court's controversial decision was based on the law and
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
