Due to the admission of evidence in Clauses 6 336, 7 337 R and 7 X7 X, the complainant immediately filed this report, which supported the prosecution's testimony through litigation which was in charge of the relevant entity and Additionally, nothing was brought to the complainant on record. The prosecutor's testimony that the accused had been falsely accused by the complainant of past enmity, due to illicit desire or involuntary allegations, the complainant's right eye was lost and the defendant's medico legal report contained the incident. Due to which his eyes were completely damaged. The complainant did not receive any advice from the accused saying that the complainant suffered injury or that no previous status was available to interfere with the culprits, but accordingly, Throne amounted to It was reduced from Rs 5,47,000 to Rs 377,210
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
