Section 24 (2) of the West Pakistan General Clauses Act, (VII of 1956), the plaintiff's suit for premature detention of section 8 suit was dismissed by the courts on the ground that the plaintiff was entitled to a third sale. Failed to submit in. The plaintiff's 60-day period was to exclude the date of the order from the count of 60 days. Therefore, the deposit amount was within 60 days of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa pre-emption act. 1987 left the trial court at its discretion, instructing each umpire to submit premature spending amounts as determined by the trial court or by a court order or by any law or regulation at any time. Can be calculated by default. , Excluding the date of the act or event after which a specific period began, the courts below, in the circumstances, did not justify the inclusion of the date on which the period of sixty days as prescribed One-third of the value of the suit land was deposited, and the date should be excluded from the calculation Unknown order was set aside, revision was allowed accordingly,
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
