Section 100 and 115 Second Appeal and Revision Jurisdiction Two conclusions Failing concurrent findings of fact and not reading the evidence The findings of fact by two courts below are amended under section 115 under High Court II. The exercise of authority can be no less disturbing. CPC, unless the two courts below either misread the evidence while searching for the facts or neglected any evidence material on the record or revised the fact finding by the two courts. It is the High Court's jurisdiction to interfere with the harmonious conclusions of the truth. The jurisdiction under section 115, the CPC is still narrow, under the jurisdiction of the review, the High Court only rectifies the subordinate courts' error on the fact that the High Court when re-examining the evidence on record below. Unlike those reached by two courts, justification for intervention can never be the basis. Many fact-finding findings were recorded on the basis of the evidence presented to them by the two courts below, in exercise of their amended jurisdiction under Section 115, CPC.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
