Articles 4 324 and 7 i7f (ii) attempted fine execution of the murder, which led to the appreciation of the evidence, three accused were charged in FIR, effective role of two accused. Was not given, while the accused fired the complainant as an employee. As a result of which the complainant is hurt, the identity of the accused cannot be suspected, as the complainant's brother, because the fugitive and the warrant under Section 204, the CRPC and the commission of the warrant Upon arrival, blood stains were recovered from the site of the accused. Against that, Section 87, CCP was issued. Medical evidence confirms that the injury to the complainant was from the firearm. The matter was reported at the appropriate time. Was properly appreciated and the defendant's conviction was reasonably appealed. Discard \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
