SHAHID RAZIQ ALIAS SHAHID versus THE STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL
Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Chapter XVI (Sections 299 to 338H) and Sections 324/34/337 F (ii) / 337 N (2) Killing Eid, Common Intention, Non-Compensation, Trial In all cases where the defendant will not be prosecuted for injury, on all other parts of the sentencing charge against the defendant, the over-riding effect of section 7ope7 (2), the PPC was that he had complained The alleged cause of the incident was the family dispute, which resulted in the shooter being struck on his left thigh. The defendants' convictions were that the injury was self-inflicted, and that fact could easily have been gathered from Meadow's legal report. There was no recourse to the vacancy or the crime by chance. That the injury is simple and unnecessary on the body, and that the accused was in the company of his friends at the time of the incident and that the affidavit was available on record, although the accused was assigned a special role. But if he intended to assassinate the complainant then there would have been a repeat of the fire, which he did not complain would have been a complaint on his thigh, which was covered under section 337F (II), PPC, in which The penalty of paying was Rs. Damon and imprisonment that can extend for up to three years, as read by Trader Sec Sections 324, 337 F (ii) and 337 N (2), PPC, show that the above sections are not interdependent Are different from the other. The sentence provided under Section 242424, PPC, was punished under \ traderunder and used the word hurtful \ as a natural imperative, while provided for the injury offense. The punishment was to pay a fine or fine. That could be the case, which is
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
