The Appellate Court ruled in the conclusion of the Section 15 lawsuit, that according to the law, time, date and place were the most important to prove the first student, and both students stated in the statement of the students' notice that they were required to submit their contents No information about. Evidence from the notice shows that the plaintiff / foreclosure knew the sale of the house and he wanted to buy it himself, but at a lesser amount, and so he arranged the suit house. Waiting to sell The plaintiff's refusal to buy the suit house after the full sale of her sale by exercising her right of entitlement, therefore, would be an obstacle in her path to stop the sale, indicating the fact that the plaintiff Khyber Pakhtunkhwa was aware of the sale before the ratification of registered sales deadline section 15 of the Pre-Impression Act of 1987, in which case it would be tempting to complete it. The court's order was canceled and the plaintiff's review case dismissed, in the circumstances, in r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
