Section 320/279 Driving by speed or negligence, speeding or negligent driving on a public road was defined as evidence that there was no eyewitness to the incident and that by printing and negligence on record Driving from was not established. Accuracy The appellant was charged with intimidation and negligent driving, but such fact is neither mentioned nor reported in the FIR, nor was anyone testifying that speeding. Driving is not considered to be a speedy and negligent act, because modern technology in the vehicle provided adequate protection to prevent it within a distance and time, prosecutors did not state. There was a traffic or road situation that required a high speed and the vehicle was being driven at high speed to look at the traffic volume or the nature of the road record did not show that the vehicle was in violation of any traffic rules. Was being driven by, which led to the accident which caused the appellant to drive his car allegedly, no prosecution had fixed it. The witness was required to prove that his speed was in view of the volume of traffic and the nature of the road and the accused was sentenced by the High Court and acquitted of the charge. Was.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
