Sections 2?2 (b) and at 449 Qatil Emad applaud the evidence and decorate the house. The prosecution's testimony in the death penalty case cannot be relied upon. Another prosecution witness said that he saw the accused fleeing the scene, but neither his name nor his presence was disclosed in the FIR. The matter was filled with suspicion, the witnesses mentioned in the FIR were left without any justification and reasonable explanation; the medical evidence was inconclusive, the only witness to be examined in the case was not the name of the FIR. Creating reasonable suspicion in an intelligent mind for a reason was sufficient to disprove the evidence presented by the prosecution. Under section 2302 (b), PPC as well as section 9449, PPC, the accused were sentenced and sentenced to one side and the accused acquitted and released, under circumstances r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
