Find a Lawyer

LATIF KHAN versus STATE

Section 497 Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) drug bail possession and trafficking, there was no evidence to show this shop for questioning, where the recovery of marijuana. The accused was of. 8 7 2011 was arrested, but the challan was not presented in court, but after adding evidence at the trial, it was not determined whether the accused was the actual owner of the shop from which the recovered cannabis was recovered. Investigation was complete in this case and the accused no longer needed for further inquiry.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012

• IKRAM ULLAH v. Mst. FARKHANDA HABIB 2012 CLC 569
• NOOR ZAMAN v. ABDUL LATIF 2012 PCrLJ 569
• NADIR SHAH v. State 2012 PCrLJ 588
• FAIZ MEHMOOD v. KHUDA BAKHSH 2012 YLR 598
• YASIR ARAFAT v. State 2012 MLD 611
• Mst. YASMEEN v. State 2012 MLD 620
• Syed MUHAMMAD ZUHAIR SHAH BANORI v. Syed MUHAMMAD ZAHID SHAH BANORI 2012 CLC 629
• Haji LAL KHAN v. GHULAM HAIDER 2012 MLD 629

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2012 →

divorce advocates from Malakand lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes