Article 2 (b) Conan testimony (of 1984 of the ten), Article Q 46 The deceased's statement complimenting the martyrdom witnesses reported being injured and able to speak, minutes 45 minutes after the incident. The report was filed inside and it did not declare any motive. Accidentally made by the deceased without any delay in the critical condition, there is no false interference of the accused as no motive was imposed by the defendant. Nor was it suggested by the defense that no specific method of declaring the deceased was made, even if it was verbal. The incident was announced when the victim was worried about her death when the doctor stated that the injured was conscious and thought she was able to speak, so she wasted no chance on tuition. This can be done, especially when it was not suggested. The statement dying by the defense of the slab was also confirmed by the statement of the prosecution witness, who was the cousin of the deceased. No enmity or reason for suggesting false allegations was suggested; my relationship with the deceased had no basis for rejecting the witness's statement when the evidence Otherwise reliable, credible, and reliable death was announced, confirming the recovery of blood from the scene of the incident, matching the blood-stained apparel of the deceased accused's eight-year-old victim. There was a fragment indicating an important situation in the remote arrest of the suspect. His crime prosecution relied on the defendants through reliable, reliable and trustworthy means
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
