Section 9 (c) Court of Appeal for the Detention of Drugs and the Value of Smuggling Evidence, had convicted the appellants that it punished the appellants under the Drugs Understanding Act 1997. That they were drugged by police officers, and before they were discovered, the drug-containing cell parcels were opened, which led to the suspicion of the recovery of the drug samples from the Franz Science Laboratory (F). SL) was sent for chemical analysis and a report was received. The positive drugs recovered from the appellants were in such large quantities that could not be applied by the police. The statements of the prosecution witnesses are found to be permanent and their testimony was not broken in the interstate examination. The statements of the prosecution witnesses contradict, This recovery did not mean that its effect was false and that the provisions of section 25, section 103, CR PC of the Control of Drug Substances Act 1997 were abolished, and therefore the claim of the appellant was made. That no independent witness was connected to it, had no power. Reduction in convictions as the trial court had already filed an alternative to the alleged sentencing in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
