Sections 302 (b), 449 and 456 Qutil Amad, home abuse, testimony to domestic crime, was taken advantage of by the suspect, he made a report in the injured state, but it was not known. Who was taken to the hospital. No evidence was presented to prove that before the death of the victim, he was examined by a doctor in the hospital, no medico-legal report regarding the deceased (then injured) was available on record. Until the death of the deceased (post-mortem report), until his death, there were serious doubts about the truth of the report recorded by the policeman who failed to say until his death. The police officer who filed the report, why the deceased (thereafter injured) was not examined, the certificate and the doctor There was no explanation for the reduction by police officials in that the victim's version (then injured) could not be treated as a dying declaration to record the charge. Ocular testimony in the capital's allegations A careful examination of the witness's statement made by the deceased's brother shows that he was not present on the spot, no evidence was provided for the suspect's arrest on the occasion. Prosecution witnesses claimed to have been injured by the burns by PAF officials, but no medical certificate was presented to prove that the prosecution had established the presence of a witness at the time of the allegation. Was unsuccessful and the charge against the accused was increased. Suspicion, punishment and punishment given to the accused
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
