Section 2 (b (b)) was not adhered to any evidence record at the last time evidence was presented by the complainant, who gave a true account of the fact that the complainant had a lengthy trial. The investigation was targeted, but, the defense was unsuccessful, shattering its credibility, merely saying that the complainant belonged to the defendant, his testimony could not be excluded, although no body witnessed the incident. But some circumstances were brought to the record by the prosecution, which led to the conclusion that it was the accused who committed the crime. No plausible explanation and reasonable circumstances were now brought on the record to prove that the complainant was accused of murdering his son so that he was not capable of any enmity, ill will or for any ulterior motive. The complainant was not found in the circumstances of a long and unknown felony case for one year, the result being that the accused played a significant role in the complainant's statement. Yes, it was not examined by the defense, unless a cross-examination of the statement or section of a witness was made by either party. On the other hand, it would also be considered by the complainant in his statement not to accuse any of the accused's relatives, no question of counseling and false chances would arise. Medical evidence also supported the prosecution case, the last seen evidence. , Supporting circumstantial evidence, namely the recovered blood stained apparel, the proximity of the time when the accused and the victim were last seen together and when
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
