Sections 497 (5), 561 A & 169 Contempt Rules (XLV of 1860), Articles 302/34 Killings, a joint intention to revoke a bail after the release of the accused on his personal probate when there is a lack of evidence The order's medical treatment record revealed that he was treating some problem in his kidney, based on which the station house officer (SHO) received the personal complaint from the accused. Released on bail, the invoice was placed in column number 3 on the invoice, as a regular suspect, and in its remarks, the SHO stated in the challan that the accused was in his kidney. Having been released on bail due to illness, such remarks from the SHO have made it clear that the accused was not declared innocent or no report. Under Section 696969, the CCP prepared in its favor, the victim was directly charged with direct firing and was also witnessed by two witnesses during the investigation. Blood-stained land was seized from the scene of the incident and a crime vacant was also recovered from the suspect's place, the postmortem report of the accused confirmed the version of the FIR Prima fee case against the accused, and the defendant's innocence. In the event of non-receipt, the SHO cannot, on his own behalf, release the accused, only the SHO or section in charge of the investigation on obtaining his personal bond. 1969, CR can exercise its powers under the PC when there was a lack of evidence or no evidence in favor of the prosecution case. But in the current situation, this was not the case. SHO released the accused on his personal charge and his powers
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
