Section 2302/6 376 / Cri 34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A) Appeal against Katil Omar, murder, robbery, acquittal with common intention. Was able to do. The defendant's case was completely different because of his confessional statement and his recovery, because there was nothing in the record to link him to the crime commission remotely, other than to accuse the FIR. Because he has no eyewitnesses. The incident was on record, so the recovery was affected and the medical report had nothing to do with the accused persons, there was no material on record to show the involvement of the accused in the commission of the crime, the trial court said But the accused was rightfully acquitted. , Who did not ask for intervention Once the culprit has been acquitted by the law after facing a lengthy trial, he will reduce the notion of dual innocence, as long as it is not allowed by the appellate court. Can't be bothered, unless it is established by the trustworthy and reliable evidence available to anyone on the record that the verdict was false, false, or caused serious corruption of justice, which was. Reduction in matter
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
