Section & 54 & inj 56 Denial of Prohibited Co-Partner Real Estate Asset Rights and Co-Occupation Concession Plaintiff asserts that he is the owner of the suit and alleges that the defendant is alien to the owner of the suit land. Should be prevented from claiming to be. In the cultivation column, the whole of the total number of losers will also be considered as shareholders in the acquisition of the suit property, which is the same rights and privileges to which the other co-owners were the plaintiffs, who cannot claim that they are superior to the other co-owners. The better were on the way because all the co-owners had the right to occupy the land until the division of their mats and boundaries, with the defendants being the co-owners of the property in the dispute, on their transfer rights to any of the shares. No restriction could be imposed. Until the possession of each other, as long as they were divided into the possession of the other joint owners with the joint property, both the courts and the plaintiffs had rightly rejected the case and appeal filed by the plaintiff and the judgment was misread or The evidence was free from being read and it was not open to any exception to the High Court in exercising the jurisdiction of the affirmation and the decisions and decisions passed were approved. The review was rejected in the circumstances by two courts \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
