Find a Lawyer

ABID ALI KHAN versus STATE

The Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Murder Umm Bell, the defendant's co-accused's grant was already acquitted of the charge because the material prosecutor's witnesses either won or the allegedly deceased sister (witness) ) Were) abandoned after winning, the victim's widow (witness) could not be traced and the complainant of the case was never informed that she was dead. The only evidence against the accused was his motive, which could have no bearing on his right to bail. There was no circumstantial evidence against him that could have separated his case from his co-accused, who had already been acquitted, the accused's bail plea was granted and he was admitted on bail.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012

• MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ v. State 2012 YLR 1148
• KHURSHEED KHAN v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1151
• Mst. NIAZ MANA v. Lady Doctor SHAMIM ARA 2012 CLC 1152
• NAZEER KHAN v. State 2012 MLD 1161
• AMANULLAH v. State 2012 MLD 1168
• IKRAMULLAH KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary (Elementary and Secondary) Education Department, 2012 PLC(CS) 1187
• RAFI ULLAH v. State 2012 YLR 1189
• MUHAMMAD NAZIR AWAN v. GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary, Local Council Board, N.-W.F.P., Peshawar 2012 CLC 1190

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2012 →

how to become a advocate from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes