HEAD HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MCB BANK, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD SHEHZAD
Section 33 and (47 ()) of the Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI, 1968)), Section (i), Section O15 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), and VIII, R11, excluded from service. Employees serving in the bank were sentenced to dismissal / compulsory retirement after prolonged service to test employees determining the status of employees who were rejected in the Compulsory Retirement Complaint Request Request, complaints filed by employees. Meanwhile, the lawyer for the bank transfer petition under O VII, 11, CPC rejected the complaint petition, claiming that the employees did not become employees. Anna, requesting her complaint be dismissed under acid test jurisdiction to determine the status of the employee, was the nature of her duties, but where there were conflicting claims by the parties, the evidence for such a case Recording may and may not be otherwise, in the present case, neither the copies of the application filed under Week VI, R 11, CPC nor their representation, as well as the copies of the complaints requests and their responses to the cases. Were filed for proper appreciation, the Labor Court rightly dismissed the request to dismiss the complaint. Oops without evidence of recorded facts of the dispute can not be resolved. That the revision requests were not properly documented
