Section 42 West Pakistan Citizens Rent Ordinance (VI of 1959), Proposal and Declaration of Title of Section 2 (c) Title of the Judiciary, Plaintiff's suit was dismissed by the courts under the principle of the plaintiff. , Because this is an issue. The title of the property at the suit shop was already decided by the tenant controller on the request for eviction filed by the defendants and that the plaintiff failed to bring any ownership document on record, the validity of the unknown orders was disclosed. That the courts below recorded the records without framing. Matters, and depending on the documents decided on the matter, which was to be established by the parties after the preparation of their respective evidence, the issue was whether the property in question was joint property, and in the ownership of the parties. Such a factual dispute may arise only to be resolved on the basis of oral and documentary evidence presented by the parties before the rent controller had no consent to the ownership of the West Pakistan Rental Ban under Ordinance 1959. Conduct proceedings before a court of common jurisdiction to determine the title of The effect, the owner and tenant houses were banned under the heading of litigation in respect of the premises to find a house to rent premises between individuals. The said ordinance was widely used and may include the owner of the cover, and may be extended to, and may be included in, any person who was entitled to rent the landlord. Cannot own this property
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
