Find a Lawyer

MURAD BUKHSH versus STATE

Section 465 of the fake number plate was allegedly recovered from the possession of the accused, which he claimed to be in his possession. Was created with the intention of supporting. The complainant confessed to the vehicle that he had not recovered the fake number plate vehicle, nor did the other recovered witness who produced the recovery memo say that the fake number. Who had the plate car There was no evidence available to set the case against the recovered accused. The decisions of the two courts below were arbitrary and it suffered gross and illegal abortion and put it aside. Under which the accused was acquitted.

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012

• MUHAMMAD ASGHAR v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary Balochistan 2012 PLC(CS) 142
• Haji NIZAM UDDIN v. Haji PAYO DIN 2012 PLD 146
• SHAH MIR v. GHULAM HUSSAIN 2012 YLR 148
• Syed SAEED REHMAN v. MUHAMMAD AZHAR JAMAL 2012 PLD 151
• Haji ABDUL MATEEN AKHUNDZADA v. DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER/ DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, QUETTA 2012 PLD 154
• SHER AHMED v. KHUDA-E-RAHIM 2012 MLD 158
• SHAFI MUHAMMAD v. State 2012 PCrLJ 164
• FAIZ MUHAMMAD JAFFAR v. THE STATE through NAB, Quetta 2012 PLD 164

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2012 →

law firms from Chohar Jamali lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes