Find a Lawyer

MST. KUBRA KHANAM versus ANJUMAN-E-IMAMIA ASSN-E-ASHRIA (REGD)

Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 23 and 24 Withdrawal Requests Released Proof of Personal Requirement of Owners of Damaged Shops Due to Shops being a part of the Imam Bargah, the landlord's registered association was running and Imam Shops were part and parcel of the Imam's handling of the Bargain Landlord was conducting "concerts" and "meetings" to run his religious affairs, and the purpose was to "honor" They came from different parts of the country and lived in the Imam Bargah. Evidence on record in Iran, Iraq and Syria shows that housing available with the landlord is insufficient and that the landlord and his witnesses are in full and complete condition for the tenants. Has failed to break the truth of the statements of Demolished premises were not required Right to property since fundamental rights were protected under Articles 23 and 24 of the Constitution The right of ownership is very high. Tenants more than tenants' right to use damaged shops. That the landlord could not determine the need or lack of circumstances

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012

• MUHAMMAD RASOOL v. State 2012 PLD 122
• Moulvi NAQAL-UD-DIN v. ABDULLAH 2012 CLC 125
• MUHAMMAD ISHAQ v. Mst. ANIQA BATOOL 2012 PLD 133
• GUL MUHAMMAD v. DOST MUHAMMAD 2012 YLR 134
• MUHAMMAD JAMIL v. THE STATE through Provincial Drug Inspector, Quetta 2012 PLD 140
• MUHAMMAD ASGHAR v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary Balochistan 2012 PLC(CS) 142
• Haji NIZAM UDDIN v. Haji PAYO DIN 2012 PLD 146
• SHAH MIR v. GHULAM HUSSAIN 2012 YLR 148

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2012 →

famous lower court advocate from Neelam lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes