HAJI ABDUL MATEEN AKHUNDZADA versus DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER/ DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, QUETTA
Sections 42, 55 and 56 (d) of the Balochistan Ground Water Rights Administration Ordinance (IX of 1978), Sections 3 (6) (D), 4 and 5 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), and VII, R 11 and O XXXIX, Rr 1, 2 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Declaration of Constitutional Application and Complaint for Unlawful / Out-of-Oz Line Landing Without Obtaining the NOC from the District Water Committee Order Ordering to Prevent Boring from Regular Tapping for Compulsory Order Prohibition Challenge Tube Wheel Excavation by This Plaintiff Trial to Suspend Trial Trial Interim Order Procedure Under O VII, Rule 11, CPC In the trial of the plaintiff in the trial of the plaintiff, the trial of applying the private defendant as a party to the case, instead of challenging the commissioner's order, the interim order of the reviewing court Before the parties are instructed to maintain stagnation, the Commissioner shall try and discourage appeals. By filing this claim, which the trial court had wrongly entertained and issued an injunction against the plaintiff in contempt of section 66 (d) of the Special Relief Act, 1877, for the declaration that The order approved by your officer by an officer should be challenged. Shall not be able to maintain duty as such officer cannot be controlled and no departmental order can be issued to interfere with any department's public duties, especially under the relevant law. The plaintiff had no legal right or entitlement in the event of the availability of. Perform boring work without the permission of such a committee on suit land
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
