Sections 13 and 13 An eviction request is a landlord's personal requirement and the tenant's default request for payment of rent by the tenant is that the landlord has notice in his favor regarding the transfer of the damaged premises Was not released. Transferring premises was fraudulent in favor of the landlord. And the landlord did not need the houses for his personal use and occupation The record on the evidence shows that the landlord was living in a shared house with his brothers and five grown children, who were in need The tenant had failed to break its reality. The landlord's statement that he did not need the premises of the premises for his personal use and occupancy, even if such a notice was not proved, would still be equivalent to filing a eviction application when the tenant rents. The lender will be responsible for paying the rent from the date. After the transfer of ownership in favor of the landlord, the tenant did not pay the rent in a confidential manner, thus, the payment was made in default, the former owner of the premises failed to become a party to the eviction proceedings. Thus, the tenant had received notice of the sale of the house to the landlord and the tenant's relationship and even after payment of the rent was sufficient to order such notice to be evicted. In the event of the denial of the relationship between the landlord and the tenant without recording any further evidence, once such relationship has been proved, the rental There is no other way for the controller to leave, except for the order to evict the tenants.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
