In section 13 (2) (i) and 15, the initial burden on the tenant to remove the tenant on default was the landlord's default. Payment was the default. The burden shifted to the tenant on this sworn claim, but he failed to relieve such a burden. The tenant insisted that he pay the rent regularly, then he sent the rent through a money order, which the landlord had refused, he had submitted the rent. In court, receipts were made in the name of the landlord's tenant, but he failed to present the post office representative to establish his claim, and failed to record the postman's statement that he had been denied. The landlord who received the money order sent by the tenant Burden was on the tenant that the rent was timely presented and submitted to the court, but it was a complete failure by the tenant to pay the consent. It was. In the period provided to the landlord, the rent within the stipulated period, but the tenant had failed to fulfill its obligation, but this too had become the default condition for payment of rent by the tenant without cause. The rent payment is retained in a predetermined range of situations in finding a rent controller
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
