Find a Lawyer

SECRETARY BOARD OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA versus QADIR BAKHSH

The plaintiff's request for the amendment of section 120 law evidence (10 of 1984), Article 117 of the Specific Relief Act (of 1877), the declaration of section 42 title and the amendment of the registration period, beyond the stipulated period of the case, was that the plaintiff request her Got it. The change had to be brought within two months before the filing of the Professional Burden suit to prove that he was unaware of such enrollment at the relevant time, which he recently came to know. n

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012

• MUHAMMAD DAUD v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN 2012 PLC(CS) 1048
• KALA KHAN v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1053
• Syed MUHAMMAD JAVED AHMED v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1068
• LIAQUAT v. Haji ALLA-UD-DIN 2012 CLC 1104
• and Shagufta Begum, Members FAHEEM ROBIN v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Secretary Home and Tribal Affairs, Quetta 2012 PLC(CS) 1171
• FAZAL MIR alias ZALLAI v. State 2012 MLD 1205
• DAD MUHAMMAD v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1207
• ABDUL KHALIQ v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary, Civil Secretariat 2012 PLC(CS) 1211

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2012 →

us immigration advocates from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes