Section 2 (2 (b) / Q 34) Qatiel Omar, Definition of Evidence with Joint Intention - Recording his statement during the trial contradicts the contents of the FIR and has improved his statement before the court. The identity of the accused was not paraded, the attacker, who was following the victim and was attacked by the prosecution witness, could not identify the culprit who escaped on the spot. There was evidence of a very weak type, it could not be kept free of any stains, and they could not be safely relied on to secure punishment. This was because the prosecution's witness statement on the prosecution's testimony on the assaults on the victim did not establish the suspect's recovery of more knives on the slain person's recovery. Neither the memo nor his confessional statement, no chemical analysis report was available to prove that the doctor's statement was as if the ax had been stained, though it had led to the unnatural death. But the statements of the witnesses were also ambiguous about the motive of the incident and their motive was not established by their testimony, the prosecution failed to provide any explanation for the change in the custody of the accused a hundred miles away. Recording their confessional statements; while magistrates were available at the relevant place to record confessional statements to the authorized authorities, the procedure for recording the confessional statements of the accused was not observed, even the memorandum in the confessional statement. Not in accordance with the requirements of section 160 (3)
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
