JAMAL-UD-DIN versus CHIEF JUSTICE, BALOCHISTAN HIGH COURT
R 5 Balochistan Civil Servants (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1992, R 14 Appeal to the Department represented by the Appellant challenged the notification under which he was returned from the post of Senior Civil Judge to Judicial Magistrate. Because they have no information. The proceedings against him and the representation of the department presented by the appellant on the basis of irrefutable evidence were denied on the basis that he was given a period of time to submit the representation / departmental appeal to the department authority. Was done (60) According to the Balochistan Civil Servant (Appeal) Rules 1983, by day, the appellant's application was submitted five months after the said period, after the expiry of sixty days, on the basis of which the appellant had shown reasonable cause. Had Delays can occur if this is the case. They had merely pleaded that they had no knowledge of unclean orders, however, they were specifically charged with the contents of the appellant's representations on behalf of the appellant. An inconsistent position was not taken from. The date for obtaining information on defective orders was beyond the prescribed period of representation by the appellant and the delay was not for any valid reason or the grounds for contempt of appeal were dismissed.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
