SAID MUHAMMAD versus CHIEF SECRETARY, BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA
Article 14 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Civil Service Group Insurance, Payment of Employees' Contribution to Retirement Scope Petitioners, in other cases, the ugly clause of the notification issued after the announcement of the Provincial Employees Group Insurance Ordinance (Balochistan), 2007. It was stipulated that employees who retired between 1 7 2007 and 21 12 2008 will be paid the actual amount of their contribution to group insurance and, in addition, in the appropriate application, applicants believe that old and new. There is no difference in retiring employees. The subordinate clause and retiring before 2007, 7; were entitled to their contribution to group insurance as it was deducted from their own salary. Prior to the decision, the Supreme Court and the High Court had refused to give the results to that extent. Otherwise, only the assurance amount was stated to the employees and therefore had to be read with the Ordinance Petitioners' Section 14 and Schedule, which failed to question the Provincial Employees Group Insurance Ordinance (Balochistan), 2007. Which had a huge impact on other laws, rules. Notifications etc., discrimination notification, therefore, keeping in view the facts of the facts, and not challenging the ordinance, did not remain in the field of applicants, in which case, constitutional petitions were not excluded.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
