Section 302 (b) Conan testimony (10 of 1984), Article 21 The testimony of Qatil Ahmed's testimony was confirmed for the last time circular evidence and medical evidence was last seen in the company of the accused (appellant), and it Was stated in such evidence. One of the prosecution's witnesses, in a double-sided manner, described the prosecution's witness (deputy tehsildar) as the interrogator revealed that he had thrown the body of the deceased into the well after the victim was killed. The police took the victim to the location where the body of the victim was recovered. The recovery of the body from the well was confirmed by the suspect's identity, and medical evidence also supported the prosecution's case. That he could not present a plausible explanation as to where and where the deceased had separated, and Thus they can not remove the burden of disease of Article 21 of the law of evidence as it was. 1984, Failure to send weapons of crime to the Franzic Science Laboratory, articles on the involvement of private witnesses and the identification of the suspect at the time of the alleged recovery of the weapons of the crime, such an error by the investigating officer could not mean that the prosecution Was the whole affair. Be suspicious, together with the circumstances, a strong chain of circumstances was provided, which led to the conclusion that it was the accused who had committed the murder of the victim, dismissing the accused's appeal. Was recorded and recorded by conviction and conviction. The trial court was intact
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
