Articles 2?2 (b) and 7i7a (ii) lead to the evidence of Qutel-e-Admiral and Shuja'i Mujahid defenders, despite strong efforts, to raise doubts about the date, time and presence of prosecution witnesses on this occasion. I was unsuccessful. The presence of a prosecution witness at a short distance from the scene of the incident cannot be doubted to be natural, but the weight cannot be protected from hearing his statement, despite a lengthy inspection, shaking the truth of his statements. Not found Could not raise suspicion in prosecutor's testimony and prosecution case, medical evidence produced by prosecution, statements of prosecution witnesses were fully confirmed, positive report from chemical expert licensed TT pistols and magazines after litigation. Has further enhanced the recovery of The incident in the suspect's possession reinforced the prosecution's version There was no enmity or enmity with the prosecution's witnesses The statements of the witnesses were straightforward, coherent and faithfully influenced. There is no legal justification for involving an innocent person. Or, in the presence of eyewitnesses to the crime scene and the accused, rather than the actual culprit, the accusers in the commission of the crime stood beyond reasonable doubt, in which case, the prosecution was not completely satisfied. Despite presenting statements of two eyewitnesses, he did not present a third witness. Because it is a prosecution for presenting the number of witnesses listed in the witness calendar. There was no delay in recording the statements of the prosecution witnesses,
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
