RASHEED TAREEN versus CHAIRMAN WORKS WELFARE BOARD BALOCHISTAN
Section 11B (3) Workers \ Welfare Fund (Employees Service) Rules, 1997, Rule 12 and 25 (1) Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 199 and 212 Individual Scope and Terms of Service Affected by Retaining Constitution Petition Lack of Complaint in the Department Applicant argued that after the recommendation of the provincial government, he would not be able to return to his home department and was absorbed in borrowing the department, only on the recommendation of the provincial government on a permanent basis. It could not be absorbed or because of no object certificate. nding was issued by the lending department, which was later withdrawn by the petitioner, by the selection committee or selection board in view of RR 12 and 25 (1) (iv) of the Workers Welfare Board (Employees Service). Petitioner was not officially recommended to be permanently absorbed in borrowing. The Rules, 1997 Constitutional Petitioner cannot claim permanent absorption in the Depository Department as this Department borrowing Petition was a Government Employee and the Petitioner was required to repatriate / repatriate the Deposit or to absorb any Deposit permanently. Could not claim permanent absorption because the applicant's license was maintained with the lender's department. In order to refuse to borrow the Department for permanent absorption, the applicant cannot be called a grieving person whether the applicant was legally standing to take on the Department's debt permanently, subject to the terms and conditions of the applicant. Was concerned, therefore, to entertain and decide the matter under Article 122 of the Constitution, using the powers under Article 199 of the Constitution.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
