Sections 302 (b) and 324 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6 and 7 of Kotal Amad, tried on a day of murder and sentenced to terrorism, the scope trial court has proposed lower sentence for lack of men. Was presented. To commit a crime, he must have a criminal intent again. Intentions did not mean the existence of a previous design or prediction, but could be proved or charged. He was fully aware of the outcome of his act, reflecting his intention to fire indiscriminately by the accused on the main part of the victims, leading to the unforeseen result that was the cause of the death of the accused. The evidence presented was straightforward, trustworthy, consistent, consistent, irresistible, irrelevant, and brought home to the accused against the accused. The evidence did not face any weakness. It was beyond any imagination to imagine such matters as the absence of any MNA RA or motive accused's death or the absence and absence of intent to commit the murder of unarmed victims. The closing of the court was by the accused. In these situations, there are no excluded reasons that could justify the defendant's sympathy, kindness or privileged treatment. In the absence of any lesser and prisoner situation, the sentence of life imprisonment to the accused was changed to death sentence, justifying the imposition of a lesser sentence.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
