HAJI GHOUSUDDIN versus THE STATE THROUGH NAB AUTHORITIES, QUETTA
Section 33 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 80 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, for the payment of imprisonment for the payment of dues for the collection of dues. The penalty cannot be recovered through the provisions of section 80, going through the imprisonment for payment for payment of a justification, not acting as a discharge or satisfaction on the payment order. Despite being sentenced to life in prison for the payment of a fine, the responsibility of the accused was still there and could also be enforced for the special reason listed in section 80 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967. , Was authorized by any law firm. Receipt of any amount as arrears of land revenue subject to the condition that the determination of the dues, affixed and known amount of penalties was appealed from the accused as arrears of land revenue. Was, therefore, unable to take advantage of his alleged imprisonment in lieu of payment of fines, the accused failed to identify any illegal or irregularities, which would interfere with the High Court's order to recover the fine. Because residual appeal for land revenue was excluded. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
